Epstein Secrets

te that in Boom as well, the victims' identities were not initially disclosed. As the AUSA wrote in that case: "This filing is made cx pane because Boehm, in his plea agreement, waived any rights he had pertaining to the selection of beneficiaries and the disbursement of funds to such beneficiaries."

erest in maintaining their privacy; (6) Experience litigating in federal court in the Southern District of Florida; ' Your letter references U.S v Boehm, No. 3:04CR00003 Ala 2004) as a model for a restitution fund settlement. I asked our prosecutor to contact the ALMA in that case, In that matter, t

en Mr. Lelkowitz and myself that any appeal to Washington would be undertaken expeditiously. On September 7, 2007,1, along with FAUSA Sloman, AUSAs McMillan and Villafatia, and FBI agents, met with you, Mr. Lelkowitz, and Ms. Sanchez. I understood that you wished to present federalism-based concerns reg

ter handled between Mr. Epstein and the victims' representatives, and that this Office should not act as intermediary. Finally, I would note that in Boehm as well, the victims' identities were not initially disclosed. As the AUSA wrote in that ease• "This filing is made ex pane because Boehm, in his p

erest in maintaining their privacy; (6) Experience litigating in federal court in the Southern District of Florida; 2 Your letter references US. I Boehm, No. 3:04CR00003 (D. Ala 2004) as a model for a restitution fund settlement. I asked our prosecutor to contact the AUSA in that case. In that matter

n Mr. Lefkowitz and myself that any appeal to Washington would be undertaken expeditiously. On September 7, 2007, I, along with FAUSA Sloman, AUSAs McMillan and Vi I lafaiia, and FBI agents, met with you, Mr. Lefkowitz, and Ms. Sanchez. I understood that you wished to present federalism-based concerns r

rest in maintaining their privacy; (6) Experience litigating in federal court in the Southern District of Florida; 2 Your letter references U.S. I Boehm, No. 3:04CR00003 (D. Ala 2004) as a model for a restitution fund settlement. I asked our prosecutor to contact the AUSA in that case. In that matter

ter handled between Mr. Epstein and the victims' representatives, and that this Office should not act as intermediary. Finally, I would note that in Boehm as well, the victims' identities were not initially disclosed. As the AUSA wrote in that case: "This filing is made ex parte because Boehm, in his

en Mr. Lefkowitz and myself that any appeal to Washington would be undertaken expeditiously. On September 7, 2007,1, along with FAUSA Sloman, AUSAs McMillan and Villafafta, and FBI agents, met with you, Mr. Lefkowitz, and Ms. Sanchez. I understood that you wished to present federalism-based concerns reg

ey may choose to walk away, they may choose to settle, or they may choose to sue. It should be the victims' choice.- 2 Your letter references U.S. 'Boehm, No. 3:04CR00003 (D. Ala 2004) as a model for a restitution fund settlement. I asked our prosecutor to contact the AUSA in that case. In that matter

at in that case as well, the victim's identities were not initially disclosed. As that AUSA wrote in that case: "This filing is made ex pane because Boehm, in his plea agreement, waived any rights he had pertaining to the selection of beneficiaries and the disbursement of funds to such beneficiaries.

n Mr. Lefkowitz and myself that any appeal to Washington would be undertaken expeditiously. On September 7, 2007, I, along with FAUSA Sloman, AUSAs McMillan and Villafaiia, and FBI agents, met with you, Mr. Lefkowitz, and Ms. Sanchez. I understood that you wished to present federalism-based concerns reg

e are several emails between myself and Jay Lefkowitz about the appointment of a GAL and the possibility of a restitution trust fund similar to the Boehm case out of Alaska. I obtained the trust fund agreement and spoke with the AUSA in 21 Mandatory restitution under § 3663A requires a conviction for

itation cases was a hot-button issue at the time. The District of Alaska USAO had a multi-victim child exploitation case with a wealthy defendant (Boehm) where they had set up a trust fund with a bank and a trustee. With Drew Oosterbaan's help, I explored setting up a similar situation in the Epstein

stigation IS 9/10/07- 9/19/07 Entails between Alex Acosta, Jeff Montan, Andrew Laurie, Rolando Garcia, Karen Atkinson, Marie Villafafia, andJohn McMillan regarding plea negotiations 47 9/10/07- 9/11/07 Entails from Marie Viktoria to Gerakl I cfcourt with proposed Non-Prosecution Apvements PI 9/1

interest in maintaining their privacy; (6) Experience litigating in federal court in the Southern District of Florida; Your letter references U.& 'Boehm, No. 3:04CR00003 (D. Ala 2004) as a model for a restitution fund statement I asked our prosecutor to contact the AlffiA in that case. In that matter

een Mr. Lefkowitz and myself that any appeal to Washington would be undertaken expeditiously. On September 7, 2007,1, along withFAUSA Sloman, AUSAs McMillan and Villafafta, and FBI agents, met with you, Mr. Lefkowitz, and Ms. Sanchez. I understood that you wished to present federalism-based concerns reg