Epstein Secrets

entry [into the United States] cannot be said to be with the purpose `only that she might live in a state of concubinage."' 291 U.S. at 562. And in Mortensen, the Court likewise held that two women who took a trip from their home, returned home, and then resumed their illegal prostitution business did not

S, a/k/a "Adriana Mucinska" --,-.. .- !_s' i All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1591(a)(1) and 2. Jf 39 EFTA00225801 Westchester County, New York to Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the Gulfstream aircraft owned by Hyperion Air, Inc. I 11 (225) On or about September 29, 2005, Defen

prove that the defendant's sole purpose for traveling and transporting the individual was to have the individual engage in illegal sexual activity. Mortensen v. United States, 322 U.S. 369, 374 (1944); Crespo v. United States, 151 F.2d 44, 46 (1st Cir. 1945). This offense carries a statutory maximum of t

2005, Defendant caused one or more telephone calls to be made to Jane Doe #8. 153. On September 18, 2005, Defendants EPSTEIN, and traveled from Westchester County, New York to Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the Gulfstream aircraft owned by Defendant HYPERION AIR, INC. 154. On September 29, 2005, Defendant

prove that the defendant's sole purpose for traveling and transporting the individual was to have the individual engage in illegal sexual activity. Mortensen v. United States , 322 U.S. 369, 374 (1944); Crespo v. United States , 151 F.2d 44, 46 (1st Cir. 1945). This offense carries a statutory maximum of

, Defendant caused one or more telephone calls to be made to Jane Doe #17. 153. On September 18, 2005, Defendants EPSTEIN, la and traveled from Westchester County, New York to Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the Gulfstream aircraft owned by Defendant HYPERION AIR, INC. 154. On September 29, 2005, Defendant