Epstein Secrets

t filed by a sex offender billionaire, to come into the possession of privileged documents. On November 11, 2010, to aid in satisfying concerns, Ms. Sanchez specifically warranted that, "I am speaking to my IT department and they believe that the storing of 3 EFTA00793670 any documents can be bypasse

n to retaining the CD containing all of the documents that this Court's November 30, 2010 Order strictly precluded Fowler White from possessing, Mr. Hurley also discovered in Fowler White's possession a folder bearing the writing "J. Carney — Printing of CD issue —." This folder contained 32 printed, h

homasil$V100802-1306 0-777-30 0.776483- FAX Emelt TSRarchitectstacompuserve. 340 513 4007 cm Romualdez, Daniel arantect 119 West 23rd Street Sanchez, Carlos Pedro Antonio Deatarcon 41 4th floor r oadie, 18004ipain 34 958 2504 w) 34 958 2504 (w0 estudioacarinanchez.ne, BM? 00 34 250454 w

Hadley Coin ThregMile Cross 0207 Readi7ielferkshire U r 0781 nhurdcenhurd.horn~iceco H 124 Chepstow Place ITA 995 07792 ( 0993841828 (np) Hurley, Liz Simian Hints 3 Cromwell Pia. ST3-); ',3 W687222j(wE) EFTA00191498 awe VutAt2122bert J. aVemnrCe:iw c Co. 85 Broad Street 10004 S 506

as the law clerk to whom you spoke? A Chris Hewitt. Q Who among those individuals is still a Fowler White employee? A Everybody except for Ms. Sanchez. Q Did you ever speak to Judge Carney with respect to any matters relating to this disc or these discs? A I myself have not. Q Did any agent

eporting Service, Inc. 561-471-2995 EFTA00803637 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Q Mr. Hurley, how are you currently employed? A I'm employed by Fowler White Burnett. Q Are you appearing here today on behalf what we will call Fowler White

ntent to perform the busi- ness of the employer and, as such, is not within the scope of employment" Fitzger- ald, 410 Aid at 1272. For example, in Sanchez by Rivera v. Montanez, 165 Pa. Cmwlth. 381, 645 Aid 383 (1994), a child and his parents sued a community action agency, alleging that the agency w

defen- dant's presence or absence at the time of the tort; (4) the defendant's relation to the tortfeasor; and (5) the defendant's state of mind. Hurley v. Atlantic City Police Dept 174 F.34 95, 127 n. 27 (3d Cir.1999). A sixth factor—the duration of the assis- tance provided—is also considered. la