Epstein Secrets

, 311 I. 3d 557, 161-63 (9" Cir. 2004); U.S.' Meek, 366 3d 705, 720- 22 (9" Cir. 2004); U.S. Panti I, 338 3d 1299, 1300-01 (I I" Cir. 2003); U.S. Bailey, 228 F. 3d 637, 639 (6" Cir. 2000). Case No. 08-80736-C V-MARRA P-011949 EFTA00226737 eattWithentiali th umse Ct. S.An r•&it EIVVY,_ LOHen 1

- communicate or otherwise interact improperly with persons who turn out to be minors. A prosecution of Mr. Epstein would violate the teachings of Bailey and Panfil. As we believe we persuaded you at the June 26th meeting, Mr. Epstein never targeted minors. On the contrary, what he did — at worst — w

325 (111° Cir. 2005). 6) Section 2422(b) is not unconstitutionally overbroad or vague. U.S.' Thomas, 410'. 3d 1235 (10" Cir. 2005) • I Also U.S. I Dhingra, 311 I. 3d 557, 161-63 (9" Cir. 2004); U.S.' Meek, 366 3d 705, 720- 22 (9" Cir. 2004); U.S. Panti I, 338 3d 1299, 1300-01 (I I" Cir. 2003); U.S.

of jurisdiction because judge knew that she could depart downward. 19 EFTA00224153 COURT CASES FACILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION CHARGE U.S. I Bailey, 228 F.3d 637 (6s Cir. 2000) Internet Defendant contacted minors through Internet; used graphic language describing how he wanted to perform o

information available. Conviction affirmed. 2422(b) No Information 40 EFTA00224174 COURT CASES FACILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION CHARGE U.S. I Dhingra, 371 F.3d 557 (9th Cir. 2004) Internet AOL IM chats with 14 yr-old girl; sexually explicit conversations; defendant persisted in trying to arra

t she could depart downward. 17 EFTA01729501 • COURT .. .... r %. • AS' - -.. *AMITY :. OO)$/g.PNOWNICAtI0N, ' ' , COAR.qE..- , U.S. v. Bailey, 228 F.3d 637 (61h Cir. 2000 ) Internet Defendant contacted minors through Internet; used graphic language describing how he wanted to perform

856 (9'h Cir. 2007) Unpublished Internet . Online chat, no specific information available; conviction affirmed. 2422(6) No Information U.S. v. Dhingra, 371 F.3d 557 (9th Cir. 2004) • Internet AOL IM chats with 14 yr-old girl; sexually explicit conversations; defendant persisted in trying to a

at she could depart downward. 17 EFTA00079430 {nv , . ,..y..4 .,,p.th : I r . j"'T ' -77 SS aks24.2-2.(b: 74;11-. 1~.9 iwic.# U.S. v. Bailey, 228 F.3d 637 (6th Cir. 2000) Internet Defendant contacted minors through Internet; used graphic language describing how he wanted to perform

11856 (9th Cir. 2007) Unpublished Internet Online chat, no specific information available; conviction affirmed. 2422(6) No Information U.S. v. Dhingra, 371 F.3d 557 (9i° Cir. 2004) Internet AOL 1M chats with 14 yr-old girl; . sexually explicit conversations; defendant persisted in trying to a

t- ing that the underlying conduct that 2422(b) criminalizes is the persuasion of the minor, rather than the sexual act it- self); United States v. Bailey, 228 F.3d 637, 639 (6th Cir2000) (observing that "Congress has made a clear choice to crim- inalize persuasion and the attempt to per- suade, not t

es and the prospect of a motorcycle, the letters fit neatly within the common understanding of persuade, induce, or en- tice.' See United States v. Dhingra, 371 F.3d 557, 562 (9th Cir.2004) (indicating that these terms are to be given their plain and ordinary meaning). Conse- quently, the evidence wa