Epstein Secrets

LUCKS,JACK BURNICHON,EMMANUEL SORY,BAILEY B MOFELLE,ROBERT HICKOX,DANIELLE A

Y,TALBOTT B ROBERTSON JR,HARRISON M FORMAN,MARCIA L VANHELLEMONT,ROBERT W KAPN

s ex pane subpoena, it will also suppress all evidence derived therefrom. See Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, 488 (1963); United States v. Bailey, 743 F.3d 322, 341-42 (2d Cir. 2014). The government thus cannot avoid inquiry into its conduct simply by pledging not to use the material itself i

The Hon. Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Judge Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.0 Jeffrey S. PagRoca Denver, Colorado 80203 wv.rw.nmnaw.com Re: United States v. Ghisiaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Response to Dkt. No. 227

t- ing that the underlying conduct that 2422(b) criminalizes is the persuasion of the minor, rather than the sexual act it- self); United States v. Bailey, 228 F.3d 637, 639 (6th Cir2000) (observing that "Congress has made a clear choice to crim- inalize persuasion and the attempt to per- suade, not t

oon of June 8, 1967. At 4:45 p. m. the jury returned to the courtroom and the following transpired: "THE COURT: I have this written note from the Foreman of the jury: 'Please reread the final instructions to the jury including a definition of terms, especially inducement and in- tent; also, the spec