3
Shared Docs
1
Same-Page
3 / 4
Mentions
have "traditionally exercised restraint in assessing the reach of federal criminal statutes, both out of deference to the prerogatives of Congress, Dowling'. United States, 473 U.S. 207 (1985), and out of concern that 'a fair warning should be given to the world in language that the common world will u
re. When asked, the closest case suggested by the prosecutors was United States I Boehm—and it hardly could differ more from Mr. Epstein's case. In Boehm, the defendant was charged with conspiracy to distribute cocaine and cocaine base to minors, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1), and 859(a)
ral prosecutors have pursued under the federal sta tes at issue here. When asked, the closest case suggested by the prosecutors was United States I Boehm—and it hardly could differ more from Mr. Epstein's case. In Boehm, the defendant was charged with conspiracy to distribute cocaine and cocaine base
y have “traditionally exercised restraint in assessing the reach of federal criminal statutes, both out of deference to the prerogatives of Congress, Dowling v. United States, 473 U.S. 207 (1985), and out of concern that ‘a fair warning should be given to the world in language that the common world will un
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012145 →ral prosecutors have pursued under the federal statutes at issue here. When asked, the closest case suggested by the prosecutors was United States v. Boehm—and it hardly could differ more from Mr. Epstein’s case. In Boehm, the defendant was charged with conspiracy to distribute cocaine and cocaine base t
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012154 →have "traditionally exercised restraint in assessing the reach of federal criminal statutes, both out of deference to the prerogatives of Congress, Dowling v. United States, 473 U.S. 207 (1985), and out of concern that `a fair warning should be given to the world in language that the common world will
Page: EFTA00013814 →l prosecutors have pursued under the federal statutes at issue here. When asked, the closest case suggested by the prosecutors was United States v. Boehm—and it hardly could differ more from Mr. Epstein's case. In Boehm, the defendant was charged with conspiracy to distribute cocaine and cocaine base
Page: EFTA00013823 →Entities connected to both Dowling and Boehm

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Prince Andrew
PERSON
Lesley Groff
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSON
Ken Starr
PERSONthe Southern District
LOCATION
Alexander Acosta
PERSON
Marc Rich
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATIONLeon Black
PERSONGerald Lefcourt
PERSON
Alaska
LOCATION
Jay Lefkowitz
PERSON
Drew Oosterbaan
PERSONRoy Black
PERSONSanchez
PERSON
A. Marie Villafana
PERSON
Madison
LOCATION
Alice Fisher
PERSON