3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
4 / 3
Mentions
atement reveals how inapposite a federal prosecution is to the facts in this case. Importantly, we note that the CEOS review was conducted prior to the Supreme Court's very recent decisions in Santos and Cuellar, which we believe—illuminating as they do the Court's interpretive methodology when it comes to federal
erson ..."). § 2423(b) is not such a statute. Federal court decisions watering down the "for the purpose of " requi ment fly in the face of the two Suprems Court decisions addressing that element. See Hansen'. Huff, 291 U.S. 559 (1934); Mortensen. United States, 322 U.S. 369 (1944). Santos and Cuellar speak l
The defendant likewise agrees to withdraw his pending motion to intervene and to quash certain grand jury subpoenas. See Tab 21, September 24, 2007 Non Prosecution A reernenThiso_auarantees that persons identified in the Grand Jury subpoena such as Sarah , and Leslie Groff and others will not be prosecuted. T
atement reveals how inapposite a federal prosecution is to the facts in this case. Importantly, we note that the CEOS review was conducted prior to the Supreme Court's very recent decisions in Santos and Cuellar, which we believe—illuminating as they do the Court's interpretive methodology when it comes to federal
The defendant likewise agrees to withdraw his pending motion to intervene and to quash certain grand jury subpoenas. See Tab 21, September 24, 2007 Non Prosecution A reement. It also uarantees that persons identified in the Grand Jury subpoena such as and Leslie Groff and others will not be prosecuted. The new
atement reveals how inapposite a federal prosecution is to the facts in this case. Importantly, we note that the CEOS review was conducted prior to the Supreme Court's very recent decisions in Santos and Cuellar, which we believe—illuminating as they do the Court's interpretive methodology when it comes to federal
The defendant likewise agrees to withdraw his pending motion to intervene and to quash certain grand jury subpoenas. See Tab 2], September 24, 2007 Non Prosecution A ement. It alsoguarantees that persons identified in the Grand Jury subpoena such as , and Leslie Groff and others will not be prosecuted. The new
Entities connected to both Supreme Court and Non Prosecution A

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
United States
LOCATIONLeon Black
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSON
Julie K. Brown
PERSON
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION
Bill Clinton
PERSON
Barry Diller
PERSONthe Southern District
LOCATIONJane Doe
PERSON
Marc Rich
PERSON
Chris Tucker
PERSON
Alexander Acosta
PERSON
Alaska
LOCATION
Alberto Gonzales
PERSONRoy Black
PERSON
Bailey
PERSON
Brady
PERSON
Jay Lefkowitz
PERSON
Ken Starr
PERSON