Epstein Secrets

S COURT LACKS JURISDICTION TO ENTERTAIN EPSTEIN'S INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL OF THE DISTRICT COURT'S DISCOVERY ORDER DIRECTED TO THE GOVERNMENT. 10 A. The Supreme Court's Recent Decision in Mohawk Makes Clear that Privilege Rulings During Discovery are Not Immediately Appealable But Instead Must be Challenged (If Nec

y involved in plea negotiations with the U.S. Attorney's Office which "may likely result in a disposition of the charges in the next several days." CVRA Petition, DE 1 at 3. Claiming to be wrongfully excluded from those discussions, Jane Doe No. 1 asserted a violation of her CVRA rights to confer with federa

S COURT LACKS JURISDICTION TO ENTERTAIN EPSTEIN'S INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL OF THE DISTRICT COURT'S DISCOVERY ORDER DIRECTED TO THE GOVERNMENT. 10 A. The Supreme Court's Recent Decision in Mohawk Makes Clear that Privilege Rulings During Discovery are Not Immediately Appealable But Instead Must be Challenged (If Nec

y involved in plea negotiations with the U.S. Attorney's Office which "may likely result in a disposition of the charges in the next several days." CVRA Petition, DE 1 at 3. Claiming to be wrongfully excluded from those discussions, Jane Doe No. 1 asserted a violation of her CVRA rights to confer with federa

t has made it abundantly plain that, whatever the outcome of this litigation, the agreement it made with Mr. Epstein will stand. indeed, controlling Supreme Court case law prevents it from doing otherwise. Mr. Epstein has fully performed his side of the bargain with the government, and when a bargain is based

was currently involved in plea negotiations with the USAO/SDFL, which "may likely result in a disposition of the charges in the next several days." [CVRA Petition, DE 1, 13]. Claiming to be wrongfully excluded from those discussions, Jane Doe 1 asserted the violation of her CVRA rights to confer with federal