Epstein Secrets

ictimize C.M.A . 9. Furthermore, C.M.A.'s treatment records from the Inc. and are protected by the psychotherapist-patient privilege pursuant to the Supreme Court's decision in Jaffee v. Redmond, 518 U.S. 1, 116 S.Ct. 1923 3 EFTA00201395 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 114 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/05/2009

ORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW This matter came before the Court upon the Plaintiffs Motion For Protective Order Regarding Treatment Records From and Incorporated Memorandum of Law. Having considered the motion, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that: Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order is hereby GRANTED. DONE AND ORDERED

s claim that would entitle him to relief." Id, (abrogating and quoting Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46, 78 S.Ct. 99, 102, 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957)). The Supreme Court rejected the notion that "a wholly conclusory statement of claim [can] survive a motion to dismiss whenever the pleadings le[ave] open the possibili

tion fel Plaintiffs MOTION to Compel Clerk to Enter Default Against Defendant, or Alternatively, for an Enlgargentent of Time to Serve Process, and Incorporated Memorandum of Law filed by Jeffrey Epstein. Replies due by 6/23/2008. (Attachments: #J. Affidavit for Richard Barnett)(Goldberger, Jack) (Entered: 06/13/2008) 06/20

his claim that would entitle him to relief." Id, (abrogating and quoting Conley Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46, 78 S.Ct. 99, 102, 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957)). The Supreme Court rejected the notion that "a wholly conclusory statement of claim [can] survive a motion to dismiss whenever the pleadings le[ave] open the possibili

Motion re 23 MOTION for Protective Order Against Piecemeal Depositions ofJane Doe No. 4, Motion to Consolidate Cases for Purposes of Discovery, and Incorporated Memorandum of Law filed by Jeffrey Epstein. Replies due by 4/27/2009. (Pike, Michael) (Entered: 04/17/2009) 04/17/2009 al Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to

56 (11th Cir.2006). In discussing Twombly the Eleventh Circuit in Watts v. Fla. International Univ., 495 F.3d 1289, 1295 (111h Cir. 2007), noted - "The Supreme Court's most recent formulation of the pleading specificity standard is that 'stating such a claim requires a complaint with enough factual matter (taken a

Plaintiffs MOTION to Preserve Evidence Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102's Motion for an Order for the Preservation of Evidence and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Jane Doe No. 101, Jane Doe No. 102. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit "A", # 2 Exhibit "B", # 3 Text of Proposed Order)Associated Cases: 9:08-cv-80119-K

te and unlikely"). In discussing Twombly, the Eleventh Circuit in Watts v. Fla. International Univ., 495 F.3d 1289, 1295 (111h Cir. 2007), noted - "The Supreme Court's most recent formulation of the pleading specificity standard is that 'stating such a claim requires a complaint with enough factual matter (taken a

tyle of This Case and Motion to 'den* II in Third arty Subpoenas for Purposes of Discovery, or Alternative y, Motion to Dismiss Sua Sponte , with Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Jeffrey Epstein. Responses due by 5/18/2009 (Attachments: # I Motion to Compel and or Identify, # 2 Motion to Compel and or IdentifyXPike, Micha

s claim that would entitle him to relief." Id, (abrogating and quoting Conley I. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46, 78 S.Ct. 99, 102, 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957)). The Supreme Court rejected the notion that "a wholly conclusory statement of claim [can] survive a motion to dismiss whenever the pleadings le[ave] open the possibili

tion re 9 Plaintiffs MOTION to Compel Clerk to Enter Default Against Defendant, or Alternatively, for an Enlgargement of Time to Serve Process, and Incorporated Memorandum of Law filed by Jeffrey Epstein. Replies due by 6/23/2008. (Attachments: # I Affidavit for Richard Bamett)(Goldberger, Jack) (Entered: 06/13/2008) 06/20/