Epstein Secrets

13 — considerably earlier than Republicans wanted — saying the date pres- ents a "fair and adequate" schedule in line with the timeline for past Supreme Court nominees. Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., called the Demo- crats tactics "heavy-hand- ed" and urged them to reconsider the schedule. President Obama

l activity, and then being paid afterward. At Epstein's plea conference last year, his attorney, Jack Goldberger, and then-Assistant State Attorney Lanna Belohlavek approached Pucillo in a sidebar conference. Pucillo, who had left the bench nine years earlier, was there as a senior judge filling in temporarily.

ty, and then being paid afterward. At Epstein's plea confer- ence last year. his attorney, Jack Goldberger. and then-Assistant State At- torney Lanna Belohlavek approached Pacifilo in a sidebar conference. Pucillo, who had left the bench nine years earlier, was filling in temporarily as a senior jud

hearing had been scheduled to determine a risk assessment level, accompanied by a copy of the recommendation of the Board. See A.67 (Letter from Supreme Court, dated Aug. 26, 2010); A.65 (Recommendation of Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders ("Board Recommendation").). In stark contrast to the other

y interests and triggers due process safeguards). Courts evaluating that liberty interest under the procedural due process analysis articulated by the U.S. Supreme Court in Matthews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 (1976) (balancing the private interest affected by state action, the risk of erroneous deprivation of that i

ded this investigation who acknowledged in a sworn deposition that the lead prosecutor who originally had the case, whose name I cannot pronounce, Lanna Belohlavek, I apologize for the mispronunciation, said to the detective after her investigation, there are no real victims here. All of the alleged conduct t

RA hearing had been scheduled to determine a risk assessment level, accompanied by a copy of the recommendation of the Board. See A67 (Letter from Supreme Court, dated Aug. 26, 2010); A.65 (Recommendation of Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders ("Board Recommendation").). In stark contrast to the other

y interests and triggers due process safeguards). Courts evaluating that liberty interest under the procedural due process analysis articulated by the U.S. Supreme Court in Matthews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 (1976) (balancing the private interest affected by state action, the risk of erroneous deprivation of that i

ded this investigation who acknowledged in a sworn deposition that the lead prosecutor who originally had the case, whose name I cannot pronounce, Lanna Belohlavek, I apologize for the mispronunciation, said to the detective after her investigation, there are no real victims here. All of the alleged conduct t

ecords, which the Court held "must remain inviolate." Id. at 17. By its terms, Rule 2.420 does not apply to criminal cases; however, later this year the Supreme Court will consider amendments to the rule that essentially seek to apply the standards applicable in civil cases to criminal ones. See In re Amendments t

year period of community control is to only begin after the Defendant EFTA00233558 has completed his jail sentences. 10 Assistant State Attorney Lanna Belohlavek does not to object to Motion to Clarify Sentence to Correct Scrivener's Error. WHEREFORE the Defendant moves this Honorable Court to enter an Order

unity control sentence begins only after his jail sentence terminates. I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing has been furnished by mail to Lanna Belohlavek, State Attorney's Office, 401 North Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401, this 41h day of December, 2008. ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P

ds. THE COURT: Okay,. Thank you,- Ma'am.- Ms. Boyagian, back to you. MS. BOYAGIAN: Your Honor, I'd like to note that in the Butterworth case in which the Supreme Court limited the application 905.27 by saying that a, witness can reveal her Own testimony and prohibiting that they violate the First Amendment -- THE CO

a, witness can reveal her Own testimony and prohibiting that they violate the First Amendment -- THE COURT: Say that again, please. MS. BOYAGIAN; In the Supreme Court Case, the Butterworth case', in which the Supreme Court ruled that 905.27 can't restrict a Grand Jury witness from revealing her own testimony, that would

n April, Recarey walked into a prosecutor’s office at the state attorney’s office and learned the case was taking an unexpected turn. The prosecutor, Lanna Belohlavek, told Recarey the state attorney’s office had offered Epstein a plea deal that would not require him to serve jail time or receive a felony convictio

Federal Rule of Criininai Procedure 6(e)(3)(E) do not appear to apply. See, e.g. Carlson v. United°States, $37 F.3d at 763 (7th CJ,T. 201(:,) ("As the Supreine Court put it, Rule 6(e) is 'but deciaratory' of the iong-standing 'principle' that ·'disclosuie' of grand jury materials is 'committed to the discretion o

Palm Beach County. Appendix at 4 (Reiter Depo. 301:10-12). 17. In April 2006, the Palm Beach Police Department learned that Assistant State Attorney Lanna Belohlavek, who was in charge of prosecuting sex crimes, had offered a plea deal to Epstein’s attorneys Alan Dershowitz and Guy Fronstin, without first discussi

who says he had_ ~~-x w1ih her: when :she wa_s lfand had sought his :help becoming a model. The laws"[Jit,. filed fate Tuesciay in Manha~an's state SlJpreme Court, s'1ys fi11~uwier Jeffrey Epstein had the teen perform.a.sex act when she brought photographs of herself for him.to review in his Upper East Sid~ma

n April, Recarey walked into a prosecutor’s office at the state attorney’s office and learned the case was taking an unexpected turn. The prosecutor, Lanna Belohlavek, told Recarey the state attorney's office had offered Epstein a plea deal that would not require him to serve jail time or receive a felony convictio

, New York 10022-4611 Telephone: (212) 446-4800 Facsimile: (212) 446-4900 1. Attorneks for Defendant Jeffrey E. E PFetPth I LED FEB 0 9 2011 IESUPRUME COURT NEW YORK COUNTY APPSALn C41.1911eO1/41.3 EFTA00792406 A4 Order Appealed From, dated January 18, 2011 with Notice of Entr) [pp. A4-ASI • pa*

ded this investigation who acknowledged in a sworn deposition that the lead prosecutor who originally had the case, whose name I cannot pronounce, Lanna Belohlavek, I apologize for the mispronunciation, said to the detective after her investigation, there are no real victims here. All of the alleged conduct t

nvestigation doesn't rise to the level of a federal obstruction which requires the pendency or the foreseeability of a federal investigation under the Supreme Court's decision in Aguilar, A-g-u-i-l-a-r, a judge in California. We just contend that even when you look backwards to whether this constitutes an obstru

ICT REPORTERS, P.C. EFTA00079790 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 46 Attorney's Office. So Lanna Belohlavek who was the head of the sex offender unit of Mr. Kirshner's state attorney's office. Mr. Goldberger -- again, this is hearsay, and Mr. Goldberger