3
Shared Docs
1
Same-Page
4 / 3
Mentions
App. LEXIS 20596; Bankr. L. Rep. (CCH) P83,176; 64 Bankr. Ct. Dec. 216 November 9, 2016, Submitted October 20, 2017, Decided SUBSEQUENT HISTORY: US Supreme Court certiorari denied by BOKF, N.A. v. Momentive Performance Materials, Inc., 2018 U.S. LEXIS 3822 (U.S., June 18, 2018) US Supreme Court certiorari de
Page 20 889 F.3d 116, *; 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 11909, ** plaintiff freely entered into the membership agreement. The plaintiffs further claim that the refund mitigation technique caused Tr
ARTICLE: Treating Crime Victims Fairly: Integrating Victims into the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
in opposition to a plea. The prosecutor refused to convey that information to the court and the trial judge accepted the plea. When the issue reached the Utah Supreme Court, the court concluded that the prosecutor had an ethical obligation as an officer of the court to convey that information to the judge: Prosecutors m
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017656 →n handedly to both prosecution and the defense. Neither side is required to disclose the address or telephone number of a victim, thus complying with the Supreme Court's instruction that "in the absence of a strong showing of state interests to the contrary, discovery must be a two- 204 See infra notes 528-539 and ac
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017661 →oenaed records from rape center because nothing warranted disclosure prohibited by Victims of Crimes Act); United States v. Cherry, No. 90-5784, 1991 U.S. App. LEXTS 18192, 11-13 (4th Cir. Aug. 12, 1991) (quashing subpoenaed police files because they were in part irrelevant); Ams/er v. United States, 38] F.2
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017672 →e of personal jurisdiction over them for the claims as pled would not comport with due process. Id. at 93-95. Plaintiffs thereafter sought review by the U.S. Supreme Court of each of these three principal holdings. In response to a request from the Supreme Court, the United States filed an amicus brief on May 29, 2009,
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023374 →eir respective actions. Following the filing of plaintiffs’ Notices of Appeal, this Court issued its decision in Doe v. Bin Laden, 663 F.3d 64, 2011 U.S. App. Lexis 22516 (2d Cir. 2011) (per curiam), another of the cases comprising the September 11th MDL. In Doe, the Court held that the FSIA’s “terrorism ex
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023376 →Entities connected to both Supreme Court and U.S. App.

United States
LOCATION
Bill Clinton
PERSON
New York
LOCATIONJack Goldberger
PERSONSecond Circuit
ORGANIZATION
O'Donnell
PERSON
Murphy
PERSONCasey
PERSONthe Seventh Circuit
ORGANIZATIONDistrict Court for the Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATIONthe Court of Appeals
ORGANIZATION
U.S. Dist.
ORGANIZATIONVan Dyke
PERSONSup. Ct.
ORGANIZATION
Seventh
ORGANIZATION