Epstein Secrets

r the witnesses to appear on July 10, 2007, but pursuant to an agreement between the parties, the appearance was moved to July 17, 2007. Neither Mr. Riley nor the records custodian appeared, and counsel for Jeffrey Epstein filed the instant motion on July 17, 2007, shortly before the 4:00 p.m. appeara

ises six arguments against the enforceability of the two grand jury subpoenas: first, that Epstein Fifth Amendment privilege bars the subpoenas to Riley and Riley Kiraly; second, that the subpoenas violate Epstein's Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendment rights; third, that the subpoenas are unreasonable

torney for United States EFTA00211798 William L. Richey, Esq. William L. Richey P.A. Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone l Facsimile: Attorney for Subpoenaed Parties Riley Kiraly and William Riley Service via Federal Express Roy Black, Esq. Black Srebnick, Koms an & Stum f, P.A. Miami, FL 33131 Telephone l F

r the witnesses to appear on July 10, 2007, but pursuant to an agreement between the parties, the appearance was moved to July 17, 2007. Neither Mr. Riley nor the records custodian appeared, and counsel for Jeffrey Epstein filed the instant motion on July 17, 2007, shortly before the 4:00 appearance t

six arguments against the enforceability of the two grand jury subpoenas: first, that Epstein's act-of-production privilege bars the subpoenas to Riley and Riley Kiraly; second, that the subpoenas violate Epstein's Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendment rights; third, that the subpoenas are unreasonable

Attorney for United States William L. Richey. Esq. William L. Richey P.A. 201 S. Biscayne Boulevard, 34th Floor Miami, Florida 33131 Attorney for Subpoenaed Parties Riley Kiraly and William Riley Black, Srebnick, Komspan & Stumpf, P.A. 201 S. Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 1300 Miami, FL 33131 Attorney for Interve

r the witnesses to appear on July 10, 2007, but pursuant to an agreement between the parties, the appearance was moved to July 17, 2007. Neither Mr. Riley nor the records custodian appeared, and counsel for Jeffrey Epstein filed the instant motion on July 17, 2007, shortly before the 4:00 p.m. appeara

ses six arguments against the enforceability of the two grand jury subpoenas: first, that Epstein's Fifth Amendment privilege bars the subpoenas to Riley and Riley Kiraly; second, that the subpoenas violate Epstein's Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendment rights; third, that the subpoenas are unreasonable

strict Court, Southern District of Florida Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for United States EFTA00223014 William L. Richey, Esq. Attorney for Subpoenaed Parties Riley Kiraly and William Riley Service via Federal Express Roy Black, Esq. Attorney for Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein Service via Hand Delivery aRi

es filed by Witness William Riley and Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein, a and notes the following: I. Both the witness and the intervenor assert that Mr. Riley was excused from appearing before the grand jury and that Mr. Riley did not flout the subpoena by failing to appear. AUSA agreed with Attorney Mr.

Telephonel Facsimile: I Attorney for United States William L. Richey, Esq. William L. Richey P.A Miami, Fl Telephon Facsimile: Attorney for Subpoenaed Parties Riley Kiraly and William Riley Service via U.S. Mail Black, Srebnick, Koms an & Stum f, P.A. Miami, FL 33131 Telephon Facsimile Attorney or n e

es filed by Witness William Riley and Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein, a and notes the following: I. Both the witness and the intervenor assert that Mr. Riley was excused from appearing before the grand jury and that Mr. Riley did not flout the subpoena by failing to appear. The undersigned's supervisor, A

Attorney for United States William L. Riche Esq. William L. Richey P.A. 201 S. Biscayne Boulevard, 34th Floor Miami, Florida 33131 Attorney for Subpoenaed Parties Riley Kiraly and William Riley Service via U.S. Mail I Roy Black, Esq. EFTA00222978 Black, Srebnick, Komspan & Stumpf, P.A. 201 S. Biscayne Bou