Epstein Secrets

r the witnesses to appear on July 10, 2007, but pursuant to an agreement between the parties, the appearance was moved to July 17, 2007. Neither Mr. Riley nor the records custodian appeared, and counsel for Jeffrey Epstein filed the instant motion on July 17, 2007, shortly before the 4:00 appearance t

six arguments against the enforceability of the two grand jury subpoenas: first, that Epstein's act-of-production privilege bars the subpoenas to Riley and Riley Kiraly; second, that the subpoenas violate Epstein's Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendment rights; third, that the subpoenas are unreasonable

y P.A. 201 S. Biscayne Boulevard, 34th Floor Miami, Florida 33131 Attorney for Subpoenaed Parties Riley Kiraly and William Riley Black, Srebnick, Komspan & Stumpf, P.A. 201 S. Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 1300 Miami, FL 33131 Attorney for Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein Riley Kiraly is the firm that employs William

es filed by Witness William Riley and Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein,' and notes the following: I. Both the witness and the intervenor assert that Mr. Riley was excused from appearing before the grand jury and that Mr. Riley did not flout the subpoena by failing to appear. The undersigned's supervisor,

iami, Florida 33131 Telephone: Facsimile: Attorney for Subpoenaed Parties Riley Kiraly and William Riley Service via U.S. Mail Black, Srebnick, Komspan & Stumpf, P.A. 201 S. Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 1300 Miami, FL 33 I I Telephone: Facsimile: Attorney for Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein Service via U.S. Ma

es filed by Witness William Riley and Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein, a and notes the following: I. Both the witness and the intervenor assert that Mr. Riley was excused from appearing before the grand jury and that Mr. Riley did not flout the subpoena by failing to appear. The undersigned's supervisor, A

rida 33131 Attorney for Subpoenaed Parties Riley Kiraly and William Riley Service via U.S. Mail I Roy Black, Esq. EFTA00222978 Black, Srebnick, Komspan & Stumpf, P.A. 201 S. Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 1300 Attorney for Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein Service via U.S. Mail aWitness William Riley did not file an

client privilege. Though we are not conceding the existence of any computers that would be 4k 2 All, responsive to the subpoena served upon Mr. Riley, to the extent there are any such computers, they would contain documents that are privileged attorney-client / 7CL.;>.1 communications and attorn

ermined that the information sought in the subpoena was not protected by a valid claim of privilege. RS/tog Sincerely, R r Black Black SrebrUck. Komspan & Stumpf. P.A 11/4) QIV) Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-011926 EFTA00226842 LAW OF-FMCS O. B. LEncourrr, P.G. ♦ PROFESSIONµ CORPORATION CAST 78'" STIIE