7
Shared Docs
6
Same-Page
10 / 10
Mentions
quality What did the thirty-three-year-old Thomas Jefferson mean in 1776 when he wrote, “We hold these Truths
n be more impartial, calm, and consistent and less abusive or mischievous than people in such positions. Equality What did the thirty-three-year-old Thomas Jefferson mean in 1776 when he wrote, “We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed 169 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016
a topic absent from a typical computer-science education: the physical configuration of a 118 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016338 computation. Von Neumann and Turing posed their questions as theoretical studies, because it was beyond the technology of their day to realize them. But with the convergence of communic
ce in terms of feedback, exploring the cultural rather than engineering uptake of this idea. She begins with primary readings by Wiener, Shannon, and Turing and then pivots from the scientists and engineers to the work and ideas of artists, feminists, postmodern theorists. Her goal: to come up with a new
quality What did the thirty-three-year-old Thomas Jefferson mean in 1776 when he wrote, “We hold these Truths
n be more impartial, calm, and consistent and less abusive or mischievous than people in such positions. Equality What did the thirty-three-year-old Thomas Jefferson mean in 1776 when he wrote, “We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed 169 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016
a topic absent from a typical computer-science education: the physical configuration of a 118 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016921 computation. Von Neumann and Turing posed their questions as theoretical studies, because it was beyond the technology of their day to realize them. But with the convergence of communic
ce in terms of feedback, exploring the cultural rather than engineering uptake of this idea. She begins with primary readings by Wiener, Shannon, and Turing and then pivots from the scientists and engineers to the work and ideas of artists, feminists, postmodern theorists. Her goal: to come up with a new
nsciousness (e.g. "The Ego Tunnel" by Thomas Metzinger [141) has something to say about that, but perhaps the best thought is that in writing this, Jefferson mistakes or misun- derstands the poetic / creative process. Writing a poem is not fundamentally an emotional, expres- sive explosion—it's a delibera
ring Test. In October 1950, the British journal Mind published an essay by Alan M. Turing titled, "Computing Machinery and Intelligence," in which Turing proposed an operational definition for "intelligence" [2]. This definition would come to be called "the Turing Test." Turing himself called it "the
t different one in which the interrogator was to attempt to determine the gender of two contestants, one male the other female. Interesting because Turing was homosexual and perhaps accustomed to such an imitation game. But in the matter of intelligence, such an operational definition made some sense
at would otherwise never get enough resources. Reward for Creativity There's no doubt society values creativity very highly. One of the first tasks Thomas Jefferson undertook when he became President of the United States was to set up a patent system. He remained head of the patent office for over ten years. Thes
tivity very highly. One of the first tasks Thomas Jefferson undertook when he became President of the United
se could be preprogrammed with every theory we could ever discover within it. (There would be no arbitrary problems.) This argument neatly sidesteps Turing’s theorem by specifying there is no such thing as an arbitrary problem - a random problem picked from the infinite set of problems. At the same time,
Haas, Jeremy Kittel, Clay Ross, Kimber Ludiker, Jefferson Hamer, Victor Lin, Emy Phelps, and Lauren Rioux.
or and analogy. It moves from Boolean algebra through topics such as information theory, parallel computing, cryptography, algorithms, heuristics, Turing machines, and promising technologies such as quantum computing and emergent systems. EFTA00315144 BJARKE INGELS Bjarke Ingels started BIG Bjarke
to be that history was made in public: Big visible wars and social shifts and revolutions. Pericles in the Athenian square; the churning protests of Jefferson’s Paris or the massing of armies. Now, however, subtle manipulations of technology, invisible to most of us and maybe even accidental, maybe weird, w
ere? A dim, honest, slow-multiplying human? Impossible to tell. The distinction between machine and man blurred a bit. Buried in the very premise of Turing’s test was an assumption about what machines could do, and how they might do it. “The idea behind digital computers may be explained by saying that t
aculty has included Darol Anger, Hanneke Cassel, Joe Craven, Rushad Eggleston, Brittany Haas, Natalie Haas, Jeremy Kittel, Clay Ross, Kimber Ludiker, Jefferson Hamer, Victor Lin, Emy Phelps, and Lauren Rioux. Since 2009, Mike has been the Lead Teaching Artist for Silk Road Connect, a partnership between the
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017532 →aphor and analogy. It moves from Boolean algebra through topics such as information theory, parallel computing, cryptography, algorithms, heuristics, Turing machines, and promising technologies such as quantum computing and emergent systems. HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017542 --- PAGE BREAK --- BJARKE INGELS QUINC
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017543 →Entities connected to both Thomas Jefferson and Turing

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSON
Prince Andrew
PERSON
Julie K. Brown
PERSON
Marc Rich
PERSON
Bill Clinton
PERSON
Donald Trump
PERSON
Stephen Hawking
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATIONLeon Black
PERSON
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON
Prince Charles
PERSON
Samantha Power
PERSON
Richard Kahn
PERSON
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON
Barack Obama
PERSON
Joe Biden
PERSON
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON
Michael Jackson
PERSON