Epstein Secrets

067863 A ancial LLP Richard Kahn MULLIN IV, MICHAEL 6212513 Michael Mullin Employee MULLIN IV, MICHAEL 6212513 y Capital Gary Mosko CONVEY, BRIAN 6106275 A n Convey Employee CONVEY, BRIAN 6106275 A ational/Globe Specialty Metals ph Yuen 02/25/2014 JACOBY, MICHAEL 6123267 A Gleber Emplo

tal LLC Client 2700 450 6 Ticketed events + meals/drinks Tickets courtside include di nner Not applicable 13637008 156792 01/23/2014 Judith A Webster Employee 2100 350 6 Client Meeting Sporting/Theater Tickets - Ticket Value REGENCY CONSULTING L LC 158167 6212651 SCALZI DOMINIC 6201215544 1

stions that were posed to 15 these witnesses were precisely the kind of questions that have 16 been disapproved in the Second Circuit. And that's Brink's 17 Inc. v. City of New York, which is in the papers; WorldCom 18 Security Litigation, also in the papers; and LiButti itself. 19 These are no

advance the 3 search for truth. And here we have a conspiracy, and I'm using 4 that term not as a lawyer but as a layperson for this purpose. 5 Webster's defines to conspire means to join together in a 6 secret agreement to do an unlawful or wrongful act or an act 7 which becomes unlawful as a re

Contact Source Device NYCO24328.aff4/Macintosh HD Path /Users/jee/Library/Application Support/Skype/jeevacation/main.db SourceType Skype First Brian Last Webster ID 90742 Contact Source Device NYCO24328.aff4/Macintosh HD Path /Users/jee/Library/Application Support/Skype/jeevacation/main.db

(UTC) 6628 Contact NYC024328.aff4/Macintosh HD /Users/jee/Library/Application Support/AddressBook/AddressBook-v22.abcddb Mac AddressBook Brian Webster 2011-02-04 18:00:10 (UTC) Modification Date 2014-11-06 18:07:14 (UTC) ID 638 EFTA00507221 Contact Source Device NYCO24328.aff4/Macintosh HD

stions that were posed to 15 these witnesses were precisely the kind of questions that have 16 been disapproved in the Second Circuit. And that's Brink's 17 Inc. v. City of New York, which is in the papers; WorldCom 18 Security Litigation, also in the papers; and LiButti itself. 19 These are no

is whether admitting the evidence will advance the search for truth. and I'm using that term not as a lawyer but as a layperson for this purpose. Webster's defines Of course once you determine that something's relevant, you then have to consider possible prejudicial effect. Obviously this is a case

a. I. In July 2001, Blazek entered an intemet "male for male" chat room from his computer in Des Moines and then sent an instant message asking "Brian" for his age and location. Brian responded that he was a 15 year old male in Chicago. Brian was in fact Inspector Dan Everett of the Chicago Page

njure, hurt, or damage ... to commit recent as- sault on." Id. at 1207; United States Pallares- Galan, 359 F.3d 1088, 1100 (9th Cir.2004) (quoting Webster's Third New Intl Dictionary 8 (3d ed.1981)). We have explained that this definition "encompass(es) behavior that is harmful emotion- ally and physi

, 84 Kent, Phil, 92 Khan Sheikhoun chemical attack, 183-84, 188-93 Kim Jong-un, 293 King, Martin Luther, Jr., 50-51 Kirk, Russell, 127 Kislyak, Sergey, 95, 106, 151, 154-55, 218, 236 Kissinger, Henry, 41, 77, 142, 145, 193, 226-28 Koch brothers, 178 Kudlow, Larry, 143, 207 Ku Klux Klan (KKK), 294-

HNA Group, 269 Hogan, Hulk, 22, 308 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020127 Homeland Security Department, 63, 86, 133, 218, 285, 288 Hoover, J. Edgar, 219 Hubbell, Webster, 97 Hull, Cordell, 105 Hussein, Saddam, 27 Hutchison, Kay Bailey, 81 IBM, 88 Icahn, Carl, 20, 141, 211 Iger, Bob, 88, 238 immigration and trav

d of questions that were posed to these witnesses were precisely the kind of questions that have been disapproved in the Second Circuit. And that's Brink's Inc. v. City of New York, which is in the papers; WorldCom Security Litigation, also in the papers; and LiButti itself. These are not technical

ence will advance the search for truth. And here we have a conspiracy, and I'm using that term not as a lawyer but as a layperson for this purpose. Webster's defines to conspire means to join together ina secret agreement to do an unlawful or wrongful act or an act which becomes unlawful as a result of