ied his challenge and upheld the interpretation that the statute does not require an "actual minor" in accordan with precedent. See United States Tykarsaly, 446 (3d 458 (3rd Cir.2 , United States Blazek, 431 F.3d 1104 (8th Cir.2005); sited States !Sims, 428 F.3d 959-60 (10th Cir.2 5); United Stat