ded). We believe that Kring and its dictum re- specting bail must be read in light of later Supreme Court opinions on the ex post facto clause. In Beazell, for example, the Court stated that lepcpressions are to be found in earlier judicial opinions to the ef- fect that the [a post facto clause] may b

S.Ct. 22 , 2298, 53 L.Ed.2d 344 (1977) ("Even though it may work to the uri disadvantage of a defendant, a proced I change is not ex postfacia"); Beazell . Ohio, 269 U.S. 167, 171, 46 S.Ct. 68, 6 , 70 L.Ed. 216 (1925) (ex post facto clause not intended to "limit the legislative con- trol of remedies