, in the use of a modem phrase, it is called a law of procedure? We think it cannot. Id. at 232, 2 S.Ct. at 452 (emphasis added). We believe that Kring and its dictum re- specting bail must be read in light of later Supreme Court opinions on the ex post facto clause. In Beazell, for example, the C

ng appeal may undoubtedly 'work to the disadvantage' of defendants."). In reaching this conclusion, we are mind of the Supreme Court's decision in Kring Missouri, 107 U.S. 221, 2 S.Ct. 443, L.Ed. 506 (1883). In Krin,g, the Court held that an ex post facto violation had occurred where the Missouri