cal order, or even if it contradicts a statement made earlier. (Note that this is not an invitation to guess, as is sometimes inferred incorrectly, Memon, Wark, Bull, & Kohnken, 1997.) One technique is to explain to the witness that in normal conversation we typically tell others only the highlights a

en found to reduce misleading question effects in most of the studies where this has been tested (Geiselman, Fisher, Cohen, Holland & Surtes, 1986; Memon, Zaragoza, Clifford & Kidd, 2010; Milne & Bull, 2003 — however, see LaPaglia, Wilford, Rivard, Chan, & Fisher, in press). Once the witness signals

ent in the police inter- view: cognitive retrieval mnemonics versus hypnosis. Journal of Applied Psychology 1985; 70:401.412 4. Koehnken G, Milne R, Memon A, Bull R: The cognitive interview: a meta-analysis. Psychology, Crime and Law 1999; 5:3.27 5. Memon A, Meissner CA, Fraser J: The cognitive interv