the Cl. Next, we'll explore the elements of the technique, step-by-step. Lastly, we'll delve into a little-known variation of the technique that Dr. Geiselman introduced in 2012, the Cognitive Interview for Suspects (CIS). Attached to this meeting invite are four articles that can be read/reviewed in adva

ts confessed anyway). Studies designed to gain confes- sions from known perpetrators using the CIS remain to be conducted. REFERENCES 1. Fisher RP, Geiselman RE: Memory-Enhancing Techniques in Investigative Interviewing: The Cognitive Inter- view. Springfield, IL, C.C. Thomas, 1992 2. Geiselman RE, Fisher

a brief overview of one of the more recent extensions of the CI for use with suspects (the CIS). Past Interview Practices Two decades ago, Fisher, Geiselman, and Raymond (1987) and George and Clifford (1992) described typical interviewing protocols used by American and British police, respectively. The

nd after a Cognitive Interview versus EFTA01657058 a standard police interview. This program of research should begin with a laboratory test (cf. Geiselman et al., 1985) followed by a field test (cf. Fisher et al., 1989). Dependent variables should include both short-term and long-term measures of perso

of hypnosis recall in a court of law. In response to the need to improve police interview tech- niques and to avoid the legal problems of hypnosis, Geiselman and Fisher (Geiselman, Fisher, Cohen, Holland, & Suites, 1986; Geiselman, Fisher, Firstenberg, Hutton, Sullivan, Avetissian, & Prosk, 1984; Geisel