truthful and testified that recanta- tion had been due to fear and threats. was not abuse of discretion. Fed.Rules Crim.Proc. rule 33, 18 U.S.C.A. Ellis Olkon, Minneapolis. Minn., for appellant, and Sheldon J. Eviden, Min- neapolis, Minn., on the briefs. I. The exact wording of the tint iallet• meat is: