and 9(t). Miser Indus., Civil Action No. 12-S42654-NE, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEAS 167300, 2012 WL 5931707, at '7 (N.D. Ala. Nov. 26. 2012). The court in Mica Indus. did not conduct any discussion of Rule 9(f) or otherwise r28) provide support for BIC's assertion that the TAC does not comply with that Rule. In a