ppaceno's statements were transmitted electronically and the Plaintiff alleged numerous other details that alert BIC to the misconduct charged. See Claybar, 54 F. Supp. 3d at 1288 n.4 ("That the pleading does not enumerate 'where it was made' is not fatal to the sufficiency of Count IV. Again, the Rule

these r30] allegations, and considering the TAC as a whole, the undersigned finds that the Plaintiff has satisfied the Rule 9 pleading standard. See Claybar, 54 F. Supp. 3d at 1288 ("Examining the Second Amended Complaint in toto, the Court readily concludes that it adequately pleads the circumstances c