aceno handled those transactions on behalf of the Plaintiff. (Id.) At the time, he was employed by the Plaintiffs agent, Asamar, Inc. (Id.) However, Pappaceno began working for BIC in late 2010. (Id., ¶ 10.) Shortly thereafter at Pappacends urging, he and [the Plaintiff's] management orally agreed that [B

.. In consideration for these services, [BIC] received monetary commissions from [the Plaintiff] on the transactions. . . . During this time frame. Pappaceno. on behalf of IBC]. demanded that [the Plaintiff] not directly contact anyone at Bunkering or Ecru which resulted in Pappaceno and (BIC] becoming th

laintiff's] management orally agreed that [BIC] would act as [the Plaintiffs] broker for all Bunkering and BTU transactions. . . From the time that Pappaceno began working for (BIC] through and including one or both of the transactions that are the subject of this lawsuit, all of [the Plaintiff's] transac

Plaintiff alleges ['29] that BIC misrepresented the status of fuel oil securing the Plaintiffs transactions with Specialty when, on April 11, 2013, Pappaceno sent the Plaintiff an instant message proposing that the Plaintiff enter into another purchase agreement with Specialty and stating that the For in

ents described with particularity, some statements are alleged with sufficient detail. For example, the Plaintiff alleges that, on February 6, 2013, Pappaceno sent the Plaintiff an instant message stating, with respect to Specialty, that "Business is good," and that "[Specialty] should have [the Plaintiff