76% 51% 42% 44% Hurdle rate: Consistent top returns among peers: SOF Funds vs Cambridge Associates' secondary funds performancew twt I RR to Irioec pir:nerl SA.03“: do y 'u Wt Ne:riultik to £r,tet wines' a t. a :4 1014 n. 1s. tar 7.e4. > txi•t3. Woo 1-.14 01•6). 1 1 ll 1111 7?pi:;

76% 51% 42% 44% Hurdle rate: Consistent top returns among peers: SOF Funds vs Cambridge Associates' secondary funds performancew twt I RR to Irioec paOrelt SA.03.;:e. y 'u Wt Ne:inultilk to £r,tet prrtnets‘ 4 to, . a ie w r A y r i. t, a :4 nro•Ift tar wn•lf :kr II. Woo 01•6). 111

76% 51% 42% 44% Hurdle rate: Consistent top returns among peers: SOF Funds vs Cambridge Associates' secondary funds performancew twt I RR to Irioec paOrelt SA.03.;:e. y 'u Wt Ne:inultilk to £r,tet prrtnets‘ 4 to, . a ie w r A y r i. t, a :4 nro•Ift tar wn•lf :kr II. Woo 01•6). 111

76% 51% 42% 44% Hurdle rate: Consistent top returns among peers: SOF Funds vs Cambridge Associates' secondary funds performancew twt I RR to Irioec paOrelt SA.03.;:e. y 'u Wt Ne:inultilk to £r,tet prrtnets‘ 4 to, . a ie w r A y r i. t, a :4 nro•Ift tar wn•lf :kr II. Woo 01•6). 111

76% 51% 42% 44% Hurdle rate: Consistent top returns among peers: SOF Funds vs Cambridge Associates' secondary funds performancew twt I RR to Irioec paOrelt SA.03.;:e. y 'u Wt Ne:inultilk to £r,tet prrtnets‘ 4 to, . a ie w r A y r i. t, a :4 nro•Ift tar wn•lf :kr II. Woo 01•6). 111