GLD0S183 Dimension Capdal Management Consistent top returns among peers SOF Funds vs Cambridge Associates' secondary funds performance' 7'3 Secondary funds: Net IRR4 to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiples to limited partners 50% - 45% - 40%

23% 12.5% or a whole fund basis Peak re: car ININ.ted caprvl 76% 51% 42% 44% Hurdle rate: Consistent top returns among peers: SOF Funds vs Cambridge Associates' secondary funds performancew twt I RR to Irioec pir:nerl SA.03“: do y 'u Wt Ne:riultik to £r,tet wines' a t. a :4 1014 n. 1s. tar 7.e4. >

GLDUSI 43 Henry Nicholas Consistent top returns among peers SOF Funds vs Cambridge Associates' secondary funds performance' 7'3 Secondary funds: Net IRR4 to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiples to limited partners 50% - 45% - 40%

23% 12.5% or a whole fund basis Praire; car trib.ted capr.31 76% 51% 12% 44% Hurdle rate: Consistent top returns among peers: SOF Funds vs Cambridge Associates' secondary funds performancew pa:WES SA.03.;:e. y 'void Ne:inultilk to kruted pig:WO nro•Ift l! . 03 ie w r A y r i. t, a :4 %di nn. s>

GLD0S125 Gerald Ford Consistent top returns among peers SOF Funds vs Cambridge Associates' secondary funds performance' 7'3 Secondary funds: Net IRR4 to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiples to limited partners 50% - 45% - 40%

GL00S141 Greg Martin Consistent top returns among peers SOF Funds vs Cambridge Associates' secondary funds performance' 7'3 Secondary funds: Net IRR4 to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiples to limited partners 50% - 45% - 40%

30% 23% 12.5% or a whole fund basis Peak re: cartnb.tM caprvl 76% 51% 42% 44% Hurdle rate: Consistent top returns among peers: SOF Funds vs Cambridge Associates' secondary funds performancew vscm. nu, IwtIRRN)Irioec pa Orel SA.03“: do y h,WS Net mull ilk to %%WC wanes' SOF 2006 thorwescro US$565r SCf D

GLDUS238 SOUTHERN FINANCIAL LLC Consistent top returns among peers SOF Funds vs Cambridge Associates' secondary funds performance' 7'3 Secondary funds: Net IRR4 to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiples to limited partners 50% - 45% - 40%

23% 12.5% or a whole fund basis Peak re: car ININ.ted caprvl 76% 51% 42% 44% Hurdle rate: Consistent top returns among peers: SOF Funds vs Cambridge Associates' secondary funds performancew twt I RR to Irioec paOrelt SA.03.;:e. y 'u Wt Ne:inultilk to £r,tet prrtnets‘ 4 to, . a ie w r A y r i. t, a :4

% 23% 12.5% or a whole fund basis Praire; car trib.ted carrel 76% 51% 42% 44% Hurdle rate: Consistent top returns among peers: SOF Funds vs Cambridge Associates' secondary funds performancew twt I RR Irii:ec pa:WES SA.03“:d. y 'u Wt Ne:riultik to kruted pinnet0 SOF 2006 thoretscro US$565r SCf 0' 2010

GLDUS133 Georgetown University Endowment Consistent top returns among peers SOF Funds vs Cambridge Associates' secondary funds performance' 7'3 Secondary funds: Net IRR4 to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiples to limited partners 50% - 45% - 40%

23% 12.5% or a whole fund basis Peak re: car ININ.ted caprvl 76% 51% 42% 44% Hurdle rate: Consistent top returns among peers: SOF Funds vs Cambridge Associates' secondary funds performancew twt I RR to Irioec paOrelt SA.03.;:e. y 'u Wt Ne:inultilk to £r,tet prrtnets‘ 4 to, . a ie w r A y r i. t, a :4

GLDUS132 EverWatch Financial Consistent top returns among peers SOF Funds vs Cambridge Associates' secondary funds performance' 7'3 Secondary funds: Net IRR4 to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiples to limited partners 50% - 45% - 40%

% 23% 12.5% or a whole fund basis Peak re: cart/4,4,4d capr4I 76% 51% 12% 44% Hurdle rate: Consistent top returns among peers: SOF Funds vs Cambridge Associates' secondary funds performancew iwt i RR to InKt• y 'u Wt Ne:inultilk to irote4 hirtnet0 o'N Wr 14o • 0.1 S • I •, I • 03 ie w r A y r i.

% 23% 12.S% or a whole fund basis Praire; car to% 'et! carrel 16% 51% 11% 44% Hurdle rate: Consistent top returns among peers: SOF Funds vs Cambridge Associates' secondary funds performancew twt i RR Irii:tc pa:WES S•03“: do y 'voids Ne:multik to kruted ;mimes' %I.P•Ift O.-; • • • • m a u. er t. Is

GLOUS238 SOUTHERN FINANCIAL LLC Consistent top returns among peers SOF Funds vs Cambridge Associates' secondary funds performance' 7'3 Secondary funds: Net IRR4 to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiples to limited partners 50% - 45% - 40%

12* 034 09. Net IRR 22% 29% 20% 30% 23% Praire; car lob. 'et! carrel 16% 51% 11% 44% Consistent top returns among peers: SOF Funds vs Cambridge Associates' secondary funds performancew vscm. nu, twt i RR Irii:tc pa:frets SrO3 r: do y ' void S Net inultik to 0-..ted wines' nro•Ift O.-; • • • • 0

GLOUS113 Oat lig Consistent top returns among peers SOF Funds vs Cambridge Associates' secondary funds performance' 7'3 Secondary funds: Net IRR4 to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiples to limited partners 50% - 45% - 40%

Jos 23% 12.5% or a whole fund basis Peak re: cartnb.tM caprvl 76% 51% 42% 44% Hurdle rate: Consistent top returns among peers: SOF Funds vs Cambridge Associates' secondary funds performancew vscm. nu, twt I RR to Irioec pa pp. y h,WS Ne:riultik to %%WC wines' SOF 2006 froretscro US$565r SCf 0' 2010 M

star) 055614m 1451.654r /9/ 75/ 737 15/149/2.837 1.h 20% 76% 51% 42% 13x 0.3x 30% 44% Consistent top returns among peers: SOF Funds vs Cambridge Associates' seconda ry funds performancemg secohda, %rah hetIRR., t. ... j . J C.“14,Thefuncf Nee abaft.* to Mated partnet0 OX WO. MD 3,3 • Y!. VNi I