2, 379; see also Hayat v. Al-Mazeedi, No. 08-1004, 2011 Mass. Super. LEXIS 73, 2011 WL 1532109, at *3-*4 (Mass. Super. Ct. Jan. 10, 2011) (applying Peskin to Cayman law); Feiner Family Tr. v. Xcelera.com, Inc., No. 07-cv-1914, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102019, 2008 WL 5233605, at *7 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 15, 2008

necessary to create a direct duty between directors and shareholders was described by Lord Justice Mummery of the English Civil Court of Appeal in Peskin v. Anderson, which has been held to also describe Cayman law: Events may take place wNch bring the directors of the company into direct and close co

- PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) ONFIDO Page 24 of 27 Rated [smitten fray Year Since 2007 DM AR MITO COMMUNICATIONS EXallttla Clewing *each Peskin I1C naoly yew" sobsidiary a The Bank a New Yak Melon CaveratIon (MY Melee) Peening LICerter-bn %RA. Pk.q2PM-00046634 DB-SDNY-0009458 EFTA_00 1572

e Sesity Urool Out. If roe. Md. Øe s an on you edam* nib to di a Sea 8 Fa Riero No: Festeierk Patel Sedate Oserekne PO Bose% Satban PR ~9145 Peskin: So!~ Certor tl TI7-725- 11 et I-868.&425I1 ~2511 1163.695-2511 Fa US* Brzenk PC Pc« 399603 SI Thane; for 8* Pageant. PO Bos lÅ Eked Town Ta