ted of an offense other than that charged in the indictment." United States v. D'Amelio. 683 F.3d 412. 416 (2d Cir. 2012) (quoting United States v. Mollica. 849 F.2d 723. 729 (2d Cir. 1988)). Because the doctrine of constructive amendment protects a defendant's Grand Jury Clause rights, a constructive

18 F. App'x 74 (2d Cir. 2020) 15 Lincoln, No. 19-CR-6047 (CJS), 2019 WL 719822 (W.D.N.Y. Dec. 23, 2019)28 Moccia, 681 F.2d 61 (1st Cir. 1982) 38 Mollica, 849 F.2d 723 (2d Cir. 1988) 14 Nektalov, 325 F. Supp. 2d 367 (S.D.N.Y. 2004) 29, 37 Pineros, 532 F.2d 868 (2d Cir. 1976) 4 Raniere, No. 18-CR-

od" that the Defendant was "convicted of an offense other than that charged in the indictment." D'Amelio, 683 F.3d at 416 (quoting United States v. Mollica, 849 F.2d 723, 729 (2d Cir. 1988)). The Defendant also contends that her conviction on Count One was the result of a constructive amendment. Becaus