til after the criminal conduct was complete if it provides for a higher sentencing range. See Peugh v. United States, 569 U.S. 530, 532-33 (2013) ("Mhere is an ex post facto violation when a defendant is sentenced under Guidelines promulgated after he committed his criminal acts and the new version p

the conclusion that the Foreign Commerce Clause is different than the Interstate Commerce Clause. See Japan Line, 441 U.S. at 448, 99 S.Ct. 1813 ("Mhere is evidence that the Founders intended the scope of the foreign com- merce power to be ... greater" as compared with in- terstate commerce.). Regar