Id. at 509 n. 4. Thus, while the Fourth Circuit rejected the defendant's substantial compliance argu- ment under the particular facts of the case, Gerant does not stand for a per se rejection of this argument. The government argues that Castaneda committed a material breach of the agreement by faili

that is not substantial). FN32. White Hawk Ranch, No. CIV.A.91-CV29-DD, 1998 WL 94830, at * 3. FN33. The government cites United States v. Gerant, 995 F.2d 505, 509 (4th Cir.1993) in support of its argument that Castaneda's breach of the agreement should not be overlooked simply becau

zing properties in Paris. Just talk =o Kathy. best Henri d'Armagn=c Avocat a la Cour<=> Ancien Membre du Conseil de I=E2 Ordre Associ4 Gerant </=> 112 bis, Boulevard Malesherbe= 1 EFTA_R1_02006135 EFTA02684570 75017 PARIS : Port. <mailto De : jeff=ey E. Imailtoirevacation@gmail