ude a "pyramid scheme of abuse," by which they acquired underage girls by paying them for so-called "massage" appointments. Gov. Br. at 32 (quoting Trial Tr. at 40). To be sure, the Government in both its opening statement and its closing arguments explained that the Defendant and Epstein's abuse "evolve

rage girls for Epstein to sexually abuse. They were, the Government explained, "partners in crime" over the decade alleged in the Indictment. E.g., Trial Tr. at 34, 2842, 2885; see also id. at 41 ("For a decade, the defendant played an essential role in this scheme."). This overlap in key participants, a

yment at AbTech—and not Glenwood—because Dorego felt uncomfortable and wanted to distance Glenwood from any favors given to Adam Skelos. (See. e.g., Trial Tr., at 466-67.) Documents showing that Dorego or Glenwood owns AbTech, then, would cut against Dorego's explanation for why he wanted to help Adam Sk

oreover, Prosser herself tetified these items were gifts from her husband, providing further evidence of her husband's initial ownership. See, e.g., Trial Tr. 224:6-25 (jewelry), June 7, 2011. As a result, this Court finds Trustee Carroll presented sufficient evidence for a jury to conclude Jeffrey Pross

in testimony referenced in the September 15, 2021 letter. See Trial Tr. at 935-36, United States v. Hirst, 15 Cr. 643 (PKC) (describing metadata); Trial Tr. at 292-93, United States v. DiTomasso, 14 Cr. 160 (SAS) (describing hash values). He has also testified about similar topics in United States v. H