direction for the entry of judgment." "Strict adherence to the certification requirements of Rule 54(b) has been our consistent view." In re Martin- Trigona, 763 F.2d 135, 139 (2d Cir. 1985). The district court's August 17th order did not dispose of all the Plaintiffs' claims against each of the Defendan

direction for the entry of judgment." "Strict adherence to the certification requirements of Rule 54(b) has been our consistent view." In re Martin- Trigona, 763 F.2d 135, 139 (2d Cir. 1985). The district court's August 17th order did not dispose of all the Plaintiffs' claims against each of the Defendan

d not resolve all the claims in the action was interlocutory and was not appealable because there was no Rule 54(b) certification); see also Martin- Trigona, 763 F.2d at 139 (dismissing appeal for lack of jurisdiction where the defendant appealed from an order disposing of only a portion of the case and