s made clear, no such cause of action exists in this state. Chapman v. State, Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Servs., 517 So.2d 104, 106 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987) (citing Pokorny v. First Fed. Says. & Loan Ass'n, 382 So.2d 678, 683 (Fla.1980)); Hudson v. Dykes, 402 So.2d 491, 493 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). Nor, in

2d 117 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994) 21 In re Amendments to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420 954 So. 2d 16 (Fla. 2007) 507 So. 2d 667(Fla. 2d DCA 1987) 9 Sarasota-Herald Tribune v. State, 924 So. 2d 8 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) 2 Sentinel Communications Co. v. Watson 615 So. 2d 768 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993)

icial Administration 2.420 954 So. 2d 16 (Fla. 2007) Sarasota Herald Tribune. Div. of the New York Times Co.'. Holtzendorf, 507 So. 2d 667(Fla. 2d DCA 1987) 9 Sarasota-Herald Tribune I State, 924 So. 2d 8 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) 2 Sentinel Communications Co. I Watson, 615 So. 2d 768 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993)

cial Administration 2.420 954 So. 2d 16 (Fla. 2007) Sarasota Herald Tribune. Div. of the New York Times Co. I. Holtzendorf, 507 So. 2d 667(Fla. 2d DCA 1987) 9 Sarasota-Herald Tribune I State, 924 So. 2d 8 (Fla. 2d DCA 2QQ6) 2 Sentinel Communications Co. I Watson, 615 So. 2d 768 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993)