llan thus rejects the argument made by petitioners that Rule 21 applies because it is more specific. D.E. 310 at 15-16 citin International Broth. of Teamsters I. AFL-CIO, 32 F.R.D. 441, 442 (E.D.Mich. 1963). Since it is a precedential decision of the Eleventh Circuit, McLellan is binding authority. Accordingly, if t

to a complaint seeks to effect a change in the parties to the action, Rule 21 ... controls and, to that extent, limits Rule 15(a)." Intl Broth. of Teamsters I. AFL-CIO, 32 F.R.D. 441, 442 (RD. Mich. 1963). While the Government cites three cases allowing the addition of new parties through Rule 15 (DE 290 at 102),