ts. The cases construing "best efforts" language have routinely recognized that this language can create affirmative obligations to act. See, e.g., Hughes Communications Galaxy, Inc. v. United States, 26 Cl. Ct. 123, 135 (1992) ("A best efforts clause . . . can also affirmatively obligate."). Here, the action that is affirmative

ts. The cases construing "best efforts" language have routinely recognized that this language can create affirmative obligations to act. See, e.g., Hughes Communications Galaxy, Inc. v. United States, 26 Cl. Ct. 123, 135 (1992) ("A best efforts clause . . . can also affirmatively obligate."). Here, the action that is affirmative

ts. The cases construing "best efforts" language have routinely recognized that this language can create affirmative obligations to act. See, e.g., Hughes Communications Galaxy, Inc. United States, 26 Cl. Ct. 123, 135 (1992) ("A best efforts clause . . . can also affirmatively obligate."). Here, the action that is affirmatively

ts. The cases construing "best efforts" language have routinely recognized that this language can create affirmative obligations to act. See, e.g., Hughes Communications Galaxy, Inc. United States, 26 Cl. Ct. 123, 135 (1992) ("A best efforts clause . . . can also affirmatively obligate."). Here, the action that is affirmatively