rity regarding the interpretation and application of its act. Palmas Y Bambu, S.A. v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co., Inc., 881 So.2d 565, 570 n.1 (3s DCA 2004); see also RLS Business Ventures, Inc. v. Second Chance Wholesale, Inc., 784 So.2d 1194, 1196 n.2 (Fla. 2nd DCA 2001) ("Florida courts have held th

te where the issue the intervenor raises are related to the case being litigated." Racina Properties. L.P.. v. Baldwin, 885 .1.2c1881, 883 (FM. 3"1 DCA 2004). Once the trial court determines that the intervenor's interest is sufficient, it exercises its discretion to determine whether to permit interven