on is sufficient — i.e., the motion is procedurally sufficient — it does not matter whether the substance of the allegations are true." Id. (citing Madura v. Turosienski, 901 So. 2d 396, 398 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (noting that, in evaluating a motion to disqualify, the court must accept the facts alleged a

o N'L2360f?_N •r • 72.7 1114 0 Outbould No M No 1930 59 MMI 363 MI 8 Waxed No No No 3 Ottani No No No 25-Mer-20:43 4231114 242 Madura llo NO M3 • 213.Mar.2408 422 PSI 6 Mom] Yao No P*3 • . . 211-1,4sr.2008 428 PM 2 Meow) No No No 18 M-2908 457 PM 2 Outbound

EFTA01692688 Statement For: EPSTEIN & CO Mob IO Number : ACCOUnt Minter: Customer Service Number Nov 20, 2005 Page 2 of 5 Taxes, Fees and Madura*, • 'fhb gegen helots appacable lodere, slate and local beat fees end syrchames that have been imposed on you cats la you service. We cote& game law

ID VOID VOID Cents Or Nit 09 3$1/31/441 $ BANKTONE. Tin Itinal7R7.10.107ClaINII *was Ft Waste.. eerst. hes Pr- Ca owe 05 two a 2 LIR 1 Madura is vod kr a ',wow. ato, Ins3v3401 Z0174.595) „,„ .toVOID VOID VOID Otatant04040WITWOALeartenit 'ace CO tin runt., en Satan WY BAMCIONE °rawUltr

k eg and was Not readet witin nt ~4W r* we may net prensicne sedans Mtn" Eder:boric EwPt. !renats Pia.* rixesc tatk4ishaks Wog* al Aubraled Te er Madura s reran anapcicrod deas and sects tO you Taunt and ;".irect Depcs's jag Sce Sec rely Fedra ReVemen: Pasmenus etc To FM OUT IF A DIRECT DEPOSIT NAB

maw and ass tot rea4at witin ^a 040$011004 re es may rot pronstna seem), Arta. Electra Eat, troWsx ililk tig:ffirC eaØY hated ars* st Auknaled her Madura s came preacrid dens and U1106 b yosa mart and Cirect DepeVs jag SCce Sect-My Fedre rt~neW. ta)renls et ID FRED OW IF A DIRECT DEPOSIT HAS BEEN MA