a; Grisin, Cara Subject: ArtSpace Attached is a case summary of a case in Delaware with facts somewhat similar to those in our situation, in which the Chancery Court held that a class of shareholders that received no merger consideration had no claim because the value of the company did not justify their receipt

a; Grisin, Cara Subject: ArtSpace Attached is a case summary of a case in Delaware with facts somewhat similar to those in our situation, in which the Chancery Court held that a class of shareholders that received no merger consideration had no claim because the value of the company did not justify their receipt

ative entity [e.g., limited partnerships) context unless they are preempted by valid contracting decisions." Metro, 854 A.2d at 156 n.78. In Metro, the Chancery Court applied these principles to a dispute between members of a limited liability company. Id. When there are gaps in jurisprudence related to one type o

would provide judges the occasion to celebrate or condemn corporate conduct as it relates to workers, consumers and other stakeholders, even where the Chancery Court is reluctant to formally find directors liable for damages in connection with unworthy conduct. The canonical account of corporate law is already c

would provide judges the occasion to celebrate or condemn corporate conduct as it relates to workers, consumers and other stakeholders, even where the Chancery Court is reluctant to formally find directors liable for damages in connection with unworthy conduct. The canonical account of corporate law is already c