merit. IV. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, the Order Granting Petition for Injunction Against Harassment entered on September 20, 2000, by the District Court of the First Circuit, Honolulu Division, is affirmed. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, April 9, 2002. On the briefs: Joseph A. Ryan for Respondent-Appellan

il delivery is legally authorized and ordered by final judgment or decree of the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma, the District Court of Oklahoma County. Oklahoma. or other court of competent jurisdiction; and in case IATS obeys or complies with any judgment, order or decree of a cour

il delivery is legally authorized and ordered by final judgment or decree of the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma, the District Court of Oklahoma County, Oklahoma, or other court of competent jurisdiction; and in case IATS obeys or complies with any judgment, order or decree of a cour

il delivery is legally authorized and ordered by final judgment or decree of the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma, the District Court of Oklahoma County, Oklahoma, or other court of competent jurisdiction; and in case IATS obeys or complies with any judgment, order or decree of a cour