agraphs 55 to 57, the plaintiff went to to visit with her family. That's where her father and stepmother and other family members live. Under the Oluch case which we cited from the Southern District, a 2015 case, frankly under the Abarca case from the District of Minnesota that we also cited, the c

ted, the cause of action, if any, that the plaintiff had with respect to the defendants under Section 1591 accrued as of that point in time. Under Oluch the Southern District held that the claim accrued when the plaintiff first left the defendant's home. In the Abarca case -- which I grant is the Di

N.Y. May 3, 2017) 10, 11 10 Intl Equity Investments, Inc. v. Opportunity Equity Partners Ltd, No. 2010 WL 779314 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 2, 2010) 11, 12 Oluch v. Drina, 101 F. Supp. 3d 325 (S.D.N.Y. 2015) 4 S.E.C. v. TheStreet.com, 273 F.3d 222 (2d Cir. 2001) 10 In re Visa Check/MasterMoney Antitrust