again that her sexual compliance would be SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 EFTA00285645 16 I877DOEC rewarded with admission to the Fashion Institute of Technology or a comparable college, a promise which they knew to be false." 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

ns of fraud boil down to this: Epstein allegedly "confirmed to Plaintiff that he would use his wealth and influence to have Plaintiff admitted into the Fashion Institute of Technology" ("E") and to advanced her career, but had no intention of doing so. FAC ¶¶ 38, 53, 58-64. This is insufficient to satisfy Rule 9(b). First, the F

All Defendants) All documents evidencing money paid to at any time. DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 6 (Directed to All Defendants) All documents relating to the Fashion Institute of Technology ("F.I.T."). 7 EFTA00793331 DOCUMENT REQUEST NO. 7 (Directed to All Defendants) All communications with F.I.T. related in any way to DOCUMENT RE

extravagant New York lifestyle, including a "massive" Upper East Side apartment, he failed to fulfill his alleged promise to "have her admitted" to the Fashion Institute of Technology ("FIT"). More than ten years later, based on these events, Jane Doe filed the original Complaint (and now the FAC) in which, astonishingly, she cla

y to his island, which she did several times in late 2006 and early 2007. Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell told they could help arrange her admission at the Fashion Institute of Technology, where she dreamed of studying. 50. was told that if she refused to have sex with Mr. Epstein and his associates, her apartment would be taken aw

y to his island, which she did several times in late 2006 and early 2007. Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell told they could help arrange her admission at the Fashion Institute of Technology, where she dreamed of studying. 50. was told that if she refused to have sex with Mr. Epstein and his associates, her apartment would be taken aw

ns of fraud boil down to this: Epstein allegedly "confirmed to Plaintiff that he would use his wealth and influence to have Plaintiff admitted into the Fashion Institute of Technology" ("E"), but had no intention of doing so. Cplt. ¶¶ 37, 50, 53-55. This is insufficient to satisfy Rule 9(b). First, the Complaint fails to identify

Stein was a victim of Jeffrey Epstein & Ghislaine Maxwell, in NY in the mid 1990s. met Maxwell and Epstein in approximately 1994. was a student at the Fashion Institute of Technology at NYC.= also worked at Henri Bendel at 5th Avenue, which was/is owned by the CEO of The Limited at the time. Stein met Maxwell as a client working