nstruction ... we assume that the legislative purpose is expressed by the ordinary meaning"—not the idiosyncratic meaning—"of the words used." Am. Tobacco Co. v. Patterson, 456 U.S. 63, 68, 102 S.Ct. 1534, 71 L.Ed.2d 748 (1982) (quotation marks and citation omitted). The term "motion" is—and long has bee

s would rely on the statement. Of course, the statements made by Dubin would have to be false in order to be actionable as well. See Portnoy v. Am. Tobacco Co., No. 96/16323, 1997 WL 638800, at *6 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Suffolk Co. Sept. 26, 1997). Negligent misrepresentation claims are subject to a six year statu

cy' between lawyer and client does not extend to communications 'made for the purpose of getting advice for the commission of a fraud' or crime. Am. Tobacco Co. v. State, 697 So. 2d 1249, 1253 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). "If a client communicates with an attorney 17 EFTA00805383 in order to obtain advice or ass