kely to lead to admissible evidence." Reist v. Source Interlink Co., 2010 WL 4940096 at *2 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 29, 2010); Bottaro v. Hatton Assocs., 96 F.R.D. 158, 159-60 (E.D.N.Y. 1982) ("the object of the inquiry must have some evidentiary value before an order to compel disclosure of otherwise inadmissible

kely to lead to admissible evidence. Reist v. Source Interlink Co., 2010 WL 4940096 at '2 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 29, 2010); Bottaro v. Hatton Assocs., 96 F.R.D. 158, 159-60 (E.D.N.Y. 1982) ( the object of the inquiry must have some evidentiary value before an order to compel disclosure of otherwise inadmissible

(denying motion to compel production of documents containing information about confidential settlement discussions); Bottaro v. Hatton Assocs., 96 F.R.D. 158, 160 (ED. N.Y. 1982) (denying motion to compel production of settlement agreement); Grove Fresh Distribs., Inc. v. John Labatt, Ltd., 888 F. Supp. 1