in claims misused the sexual abuse lawsuits filed against Epstein for the purposes of pumping up the value of the potential settlements, as part of the Rothstein Ponzi scheme. A copy of the complaint is attached. What a small world. « File: rothstein-complaint-l.pdf » EFTA00212613

Tort Claimants and possibly others. Epstein denies this motivation EFTA00805158 and maintains his probable cause was grounded in media reports of the Rothstein Ponzi scheme and the realization of the possible connection for Edwards' litigation behavior unrelated to the claims of his three clients. Court's Rulin

btain summary judgment. Third, Edwards has not demonstrated the absence of material issues of fact. His alleged participation in and/or knowledge of the Rothstein Ponzi scheme and the validity of, and motivation in conducting, the discovery at issue in the underlying Epstein actions are matters of considerable deba

aim against both Rothstein and Edwards) in connection with the use of Epstein case materials, which were improperly utilized to lure investors into the Rothstein Ponzi scheme is clearly and irrefutably related to Edwards' counterclaim against Epstein for filing that original claim. Yet, to mislead this Court into

in a case like this where incentives offered to Edwards and accepted by Edwards are plainly relevant to a determination of whether he was privy to the Rothstein Ponzi scheme and why he decided even to join RRA. It is significantly relevant to his counterclaim since he is claiming loss of profits and injury to his

onaire Jeffrey Epstein's sex scandal, and some newsflashes, like the fact that the chief operating officer of Banyon Income Fund, a major feeder to the Rothstein Ponzi scheme, is a convicted felon who kept an office at the Rothstein Rosenfledt Adler firm. Also included is a very telling email that Rothstein wrote

onaire Jeffrey Epstein's sex scandal, and some newsflashes, like the fact that the chief operating officer of Banyon Income Fund, a major feeder to the Rothstein Ponzi scheme, is a convicted felon who kept an office at the Rothstein Rosenfledt Adler firm. Also included is a very telling email that Rothstein wrote

discovered relative to Ballamor and Bekkedam that: a. Bekkedam and Ballamor, in their role as investment advisors, induced client investments into the Rothstein Ponzi despite particular facts giving rise to a strong inference that they either had fraudulent intent, or acted with conscious recklessness as to truth