and the objecting party fails to satisfy the court that the evidence would prejudice that party's action or defense on the merits." Developers Sur. & Indem. Co.' Bi-Tech Const., Inc., 979 F. Supp. 2d 1307, 1320 (S.D. Fla. 2013); see, e.g., Baker. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., 793 F.2d 1196 (11th Cir.198

and the objecting party fails to satisfy the court that the evidence would prejudice that party's action or defense on the merits." Developers Stir. & Indem. Co. v. Bi-Tech Const., Inc., 979 F. Supp. 2d 1307, 1320 (S.D. Fla. 2013); see, e.g., Baker v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., 793 F.2d 1196 (11th Cir

used clearly expresses, and the contract must be construed to mean what on its face it purports to mean.' " Barefoot, at 43, quoting Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. v. Hood (1946), 226 N.C. 706, 710, 40 S.E.2d 198 (internal citations omitted). [P33] According to section 5a. of the August 2001 agreement: H