o the court for in camera inspection by submitting the same for filing with the court under seal. D.E. 190 at 2, ¶ 3(c)(i) and (ii). 3. The Court's Omnibus Order did not provide for the filing of any relevance objections by respondent. Since lack of relevance is not an evidentiary privilege, respondent has no

ntered on FLSD Docket 12/03/2009 Page 2 of 2 November 17,2009 (D.E. #413) is hereby VACATED. A ruling on the motions which were the subject of said Omnibus Order is forthcoming and shall be issued separately. DONE AND ORDERED this December 3,2009, in Chambers, at West Palm Beach, Florida. LINNEA R. JO ON

ntered on FLSD Docket 12/03/2009 Page 2 of 2 November 17,2009 (D.E. #413) is hereby VACATED. A ruling on the motions which were the subject of said Omnibus Order is forthcoming and shall be issued separately. DONE AND ORDERED this December 3,2009, in Chambers, at West Palm Beach, Florida. LINNEA R. JO ON