about the same time in November 2009, I also became aware that the law firm of Conrad Scherer filed a Complaint against Scott Rothstein and others, Razorback Funding, LLC, et al. v. Scott W. Rothstein, et al., Case No. 09-062943(19) (hereinafter referenced as the "Razorback Complaint"), on behalf of some of the P

about the same time in November 2009, I also became aware that the law firm of Conrad Scherer filed a Complaint against Scott Rothstein and others, Razorback Funding, LLC, et al. v. Scott W. Rothstein, et al, Case No. 09-062943(19) (hereinafter referenced as the "Razorback Complaint"), on behalf of some of the Po

lve Epstein: A. A.J. Discala; and B. any persons who claim to have invested with Rothstein, including, without limitation, those who invested in Razorback Funding, LLC or D3 Capital Club, LLC. 5. Any and all Documents that you received for the purpose of writing a book from any of the persons (including law

36 2. Plea Agreement between United States of America and Scott W. Rothstein, 09-60331-CR-COHN; filed December 1, 2009. 3. Amended Complaint in Razorback Funding, LLC, et al. v. Scott W. Rothstein, et al., in the Circuit Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Broward County, Florida, Case No.

about the same time in November 2009, I also became aware that the law firm of Conrad Scherer filed a Complaint against Scott Rothstein and others, Razorback Funding, LLC, et al. v. Scott W. Rothstein, et al., Case No. 09-062943(19) (hereinafter referenced as the "Razorback Complaint"), on behalf of some of the

29 2. Plea Agreement between United States of America and Scott W. Rothstein, 09-60331-CR-COHN; filed December 1, 2009. 3. Amended Complaint in Razorback Funding, LLC, ET AL v. Scott W. Rothstein, et al., in the Circuit Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Broward County, Florida, Case No. 0

21 2. Plea Agreement between United States of America and Scott W. Rothstein, 09-60331-CR-COHN; filed December 1, 2009. 3. Amended Complaint in Razorback Funding, LLC, ET AL v. Scott W. Rothstein, et al., in the Circuit Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Broward County, Florida, Case No. 0

lve Epstein: A. A.J. Discala; and B. any persons who claim to have invested with Rothstein, including, without limitation, those who invested in Razorback Funding, LLC or D3 Capital Club, LLC. 5. Any and all Documents that you received for the purpose of writing a book from any of the persons (including law

Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. (hereinafter referred to collectively as ) file this response to the Motion to Clarify Prior Orders (doc. #1554) of Razorback Funding, L.L.C. and other creditors (hereinafter referred to collectively as "Razorback Creditors"). The Razorback Creditors' motion seeks to "clarify" tha

RA. At or about the same time in November 2009, the press reported that the law firm Conrad Scherer filed a Complaint against Rothstein and others, Razorback Funding, LLC, et aL v. Scott W. Rothstein, et at, Case No. 09-062943(19) (hereinafter the "Razorback Complaint"), on behalf of some of the Ponzi scheme inve

aims to be a victim of Rothstein sued Platinum (but not Level 3) in Florida state court, claiming that Platinum helped Rothstein commit his crimes. Razorback Funding, LLC, et at v. Rothstein, et at, Case No. 09-062943 (07) (17th Judicial Circuit/Broward County, Fla.) (the "Razorback Case"). The investors sued 18

about the same time in November 2009, I also became aware that the law firm of Conrad Scherer filed a Complaint against Scott Rothstein and others, Razorback Funding, LLC, et al. v. Scott W. Rothstein, et al., Case No. 09-062943(19) (hereinafter referenced as the "Razorback Complaint"), on behalf of some of the

greement between United States of America and Scott W. Rothstein, 09-60331-CR-COHN; filed December 1, 2009. EFTA00587266 3. Amended Complaint in Razorback Funding, LLC, et al. v. Scott W. Rothstein, et al., in the Circuit Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Broward County, Florida, Case No.

about the same time in November 2009, I also became aware that the law firm of Conrad Scherer filed a Complaint against Scott Rothstein and others, Razorback Funding, LLC, et al. v. Scott W. Rothstein, et al., Case No. 09-062943(19) (hereinafter referenced as the "Razorback Complaint"), on behalf of some of the P

RA. At or about the same time in November 2009, the press reported that the law firm Conrad Scherer filed a Complaint against Rothstein and others, Razorback Funding. LLC, a at v. Scott W. Rothstein, a at, Case No. 09-062943(19) (hereinafter the "Razorback Complaint"), on behalf of some of the Ponzi scheme invest

788 EFTA02725302 Edwards adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Objections to Jeffrey Epstein's Trial Exhibits 3. Amended Complaint in Razorback Funding, LLC, et al. v. Scott W. Rothstein, et al., in the Circuit Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Broward County, Florida, Case N

Razorback Funding, LLC, et at, v. Scott W. Rothstein, et at Complex Litigation Division - Case No.: 09-062943 (19) Third Amended Complaint By ignoring evidence of t