2021) 5 United States v. Coutentos, 651 F.3d 809 (8th Cir. 2011) 13 United States v. Davis, 139 S. Ct. 2319 (2019) 11, 14 United States v. Gentile, 235 F. Supp. 3d 649 (D.N.J. 2017) 8, 9, 10 United States v. Jeffries, 405 F.3d 682 (8th Cir. 2005), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1007 (2005) 5 Unite

still-viable prosecutions" (Opp. 34) (emphasis added), the government completely misses the point. There is 5 The government's attempt to discredit Gentile on the ground that it relied in part on a pre-Landgraf opinion (Opp. 36) rings hollow. The court made clear that it was applying Landgraf(in conjunc

g without limitation digitized versions), and for any and all 15 YnS SW Mor1Wleva0 .6) MatWry Nom ewe.. °knew.. Commented (GUI: Please complete. Gentile, Lucia 2021-12-13 10:4800 EFTA00037029 --- PAGE BREAK --- purposes, including, without limitation, all replays, broadcasts in any foreign area,