nt for a party to show only that the subpoenaed documents "are potentially relevant or admissible." United States v. Wey, 252 F. Supp. 3d 237, 254 (S.D.N.Y. 2017) (internal quotation marks omitted). Moreover, as the Court has explained, impeachment material is not "relevant" within the meaning of Nixon "until

ers unreasonable. The public has a strong presumption in favor of accessing trial documents. See Under Seal v. Under Seal, 273 F. Supp. 3d 460, 468 (S.D.N.Y. 2017) ("[The First Amendment] provides the public and the press a constitutional right of access to all trials, criminal or civil.") (citing r Richmond