zio Bromberg Quinn Emanuel Rumberger Kirk Ryan Whaley Seyfarth Shaw Siebman Forrest Skadden Spencer Fane Stoel Rives Van Kampen Law Wheeler Trigg Whitten Burrage Willkie Farr WilmerHale Winston & Strawn Yetter Coleman Yurko Salvesen COMPANIES American Bar Association EFTA00011405 ---

f evidence to the contrary. Tenn. R. App. P. 13(d); T.R. Mills Contractors v. WRH Enterprises, LLC et at. 93 S.W.3d 861, 864 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002). Trigg v. Little Six Corp. 457 S.W.3d 906. 911 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2014). We granted this Tenn. R. App. P. 9 interlocutory appeal on the sole issue of whether

he issue of standing at this time. For all of these reasons we will not address the other issues that Wunderlich and Alexander attempt to raise. In Trigg v. Little Six Corp.. a case involving a Rule 9 interlocutory appeal of a trial court's decision on a motion to compel arbitration. we explained the

SACE RETRIEVAL ED T a A Cap VOICE USAGE FOR Nuns« Rata Ratala Called If MI 17 34A 87 lat 1 03317 111 IONENW AL 10 $M si f.1 In: au; 3 Trigg 49 la IMP SO lira 7213P rj I i ss , C1:13. i tm i01131:14 ile 22 a <R10 90 .104 01:10 a la CA 06P 01 al 031TP a NON 06.10P ;OA; ip 4.1

IAREACA ,... I MN 0 'MUTES 916 000 ppry03.430 cal. 4.0 11. 82 ERYPITONECH FL a a ocH n *r ata n 1111 I IA El IMMO Is I LOCO /WAITE% -.me Trigg it INCLUSE0 kl METES 9'0 011, 911 an 06411209 004 WPALMBEA0111. IIIEDIEM EMT PECIIIREC ILTUTES tIal VAUD WOOL TO WM II 000 WP mcgrftws wi